News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Report slams delay in progression 

Report slams delay in progression

18 Nov, 2009 09:45 AM
IN the same week the NRMA criticised delays on the Pacific Highway upgrade, protestors have vowed to continue their vigil to stop the 8.6km Bulahdelah bypass section.

Between five and ten protesters remain camped at the Bulahdelah Aboriginal Tent embassy established in February this year.

Some even take turns to sleep on a platform suspended near the top of the guardian tree – one of the sites of indigenous cultural significance they are trying to protect.

NRMA criticism comes in the form of a new report which calculates for the first time the economic and social impact of delays in improving key sections of road between Hexham and the Queensland border.

The NRMA report, titled 20 Years On: Pacific Highway Upgrade Only Half Complete estimates delays in upgrading key sections of the Pacific Highway between Newcastle and Bulahdelah cost $2.8 million in human suffering, lost productivity and property damage.

The name of the report refers to the impending 20th anniversary of the December 1989 Kempsey coach crash which killed 35 people.

But the RTA says it has moved ahead with the Bulahdelah bypass, conducting clearing for the relocation of powerlines and recently inviting tenders for the main construction they say will start in early 2010.

And the authority denies protesters’ claims that the chosen route to the east of Bulahdelah on the slopes of The Alum Mountain was a foregone conclusion and that public consultation was limited and with a select few.

“The RTA recognises that a number of individuals have different views about the approved route. The RTA will continue to respect the different views in a sensitive way while it moves forward with building for the Bulahdelah upgrade.

“The RTA has carried out extensive investigations and consultation to select a preferred route for the Bulahdelah upgrade project. During this time, the community was invited to comment on all of the route options being considered,” an RTA spokesperson responded in writing to Advocate questions.

The statement goes on to say the route was selected based on a number of factors including the outcomes of a value management workshop, input from the community, and the RTA’s own investigations. “It represents the best possible balance across a range of competing needs.”

Key advantages of the route according to the RTA include: proximity to town, providing enhanced opportunities to attract passing trade; a shorter route, which would have construction program benefits and reduced impact on the natural environment; fewer impacts on potential sites of Aboriginal cultural significance; fewer impacts on prime agricultural land and rural enterprises; and reduced potential environmental impacts on the local drinking water catchments.

In relation to potential rock falls from the mountain the spokesperson said the RTA investigated the risks of geotechnical failure and found them to be ‘either within acceptable limits or not considered to be credible risks’.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


No comments yet. Be the first to comment below.

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Hawks Nest First National Real Estate
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...