News 
 National News 
 National 
 General 
 Health debate: The worm has spoken and it is Rudd 

Health debate: The worm has spoken and it is Rudd

23 Mar, 2010 12:35 PM
Australians greatly prefer Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's plans for health over Opposition Leader Tony Abbott's, according to commercial television audience measures.

The first of three ''election season'' debates to be held between the leaders has begun at the National Press Club.

Channels 7 and 9 are tracking a selected audience's responses to the leaders, and midway trough the debate Mr Rudd was seen to be delivering the more positive message. Mr Rudd's comments were generally rating in the high positive range, while Mr Abbott's were generally lower and often dropped into negative territory, especially when he attacked the Government.

In his opening statement, Mr Kevin Rudd referred to his youth, saying he spent a lot of time in public hospitals as a child

''As a kid growing up in country Queensland, I spent a fair share, sometimes too fair a share, sitting in ... hospitals and my mum and dad in those days didn't have a lot of money and therefore we depended on the public system,'' he said.

Mr Rudd said there were real problems in Australia's health system. There were not enough doctors and nurses, waiting lists were too long and there was ''too much bureaucracy getting in the way of getting resources to front line services''.

Costs were going through the roof, and state budgets would be overwhelmed within 20 to 30 years if there was not a change to the funding system.

It was time for national and state leaders to come together and cooperate to fix the system.

''I believe we can work across the political divide, because people are demanding that. If we can't get agreement, I'll take our plan to the people, to get a mandate to make it happen,'' he said.

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott, who defended his record as health minister, said Mr Rudd's biggest broken promise was not fixing the public hospital system.

“Anyone can make promises, the hard part is delivering on them and this is where Mr Rudd has consistently failed,'' he said.

He said the Government's plan would not end the blame game, and would not mean any more money for doctors, nurses or hospitals until 2014.

''That's two elections away. Hospitals are too important for amateur hour experimentation,'' he said.

He said no one, neither state nor federal ministers, would really be in charge under Mr Rudd's changes.

He also asked why people should trust the government to fix health when it was unable to manage a program putting insulation into roofs and computers into schools.

He said the Coalition would create boards to run significant hospitals, restoring control to local communities.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Is it me or did the worm jump every time that Rudd so much as cleared his throat? Channel 9 has a bit to answer for, I think.
Posted by Skeptical, 23/03/2010 12:41:18 PM
yes yes very skeptical! no sooner did krudd get up did the worm also!!!
Posted by illawarratruth, 23/03/2010 1:57:52 PM
Glad the worm doesn't vote.What rubbish, that's why I preferred watching the debate on the ABC ,worm free,my biggest mistake was to turn to channel 9 at the conclusion. I don't know where they find these mugs to sit in the audience but they didn't look the brightest bunch God ever put together.With all the blunders this Government has created and to allow the people in this audience to vote on election day,GOD help us all
Posted by B/S, 23/03/2010 2:25:23 PM
Well said Skeptical, everyone knows the worm loves Labor spin. Rudd was too gutless and/or rude to face Abbott whenever he spoke as was the case with the NSW Premier.
Posted by Allan, 23/03/2010 2:26:10 PM
Rudd sounded like his debate was a series pre-recorded sound bites strung together. The worm seemed to change depending on who was in view rather than if what was said was an honest and comprehensible argument. Maybe the worm says that the king of spin is still king and the audience still buys it. 60% funding = end the blame game eh? Hmmmmm, no money for more beds for at least 4 years and doctors take 6 years to train....Wont Kev-UN Rudd be at the UN by then? Awesome how he promises everything will be fixed by the time he is no longer there and people love it.
Posted by James of the West, 23/03/2010 2:47:31 PM
The same as past debates .. when labour speaks the worm goes positive & when liberals speak the worm goes negative ....
Posted by A Citizen, 23/03/2010 3:19:20 PM
I watched the Debate on Foxtel and Abbott came off as aggresive and lacking in good humor . His form seemed to consist only of attack. Rudd appeared calm and in control. Mr Rudd you won my vote. No-one likes a bully and Tony Abbott has bully stamped all over him
Posted by Boilermaker, 23/03/2010 4:48:55 PM
this was a lot of rubbish that worm is a joke I turned it to a channel that didn't have that stupid thing accross the screen , funny the worm said Rudd all the polls I have seen says Abbott . Why would you let rudd take over the hospitals he has stuffed everything else, if rudd is elected again we really will have a reccession, he wastes so much money. He just recently gave indonesia $30 dollars to save thier trees, What a dam joke he keeps selling us out
Posted by wab, 23/03/2010 8:24:07 PM
How on earth can anyone claim that Australians greatly prefer Kevin Rudd based on a television ratings stunt that uses 100 nobodies to control a ridiculous worm?
Posted by R U Joking, 24/03/2010 4:43:09 AM
I think skeptical is truly skeptical or employs the tactic of spoiling the Australian peoples chance for a better health care system. Private health care, like private education ought to be the choice for those of us who can afford the costs. Most Australians, especially those with only their labour to sell to people who own capital, and who pay wages that do not always represent the true costs of living, ought to be grateful for the "fair go health" system that the Rudd Government wants to implement. When Australia was running a huge surplus, due to the mining boom, and before the economic global crash, Abbott as health minister ripped $1 Billion dollars out of the public system. The impact of which did a great deal to assist the privately owned health care industry. Had the Howard government been returned to govern in 2007, we Australians would have been subject to an US styled system, a bad system which the Obama Administration is finally consigning to the dustbin of history. Abbott has nothing to offer us on health care except cheap talk.
Posted by Ralf, 24/03/2010 5:25:42 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
23 March, 2010

Most popular articles




Myall Coast







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...